什么是碱中毒
Bysen:Sprotected2 Bysen:Policy
| Tis ge?rit h?ft ?ordc?ide on Nī?englisce. |
Be?itendas, gel?rde s?ā admins and eac hātene sysops (system operators), sind ?icip?dia ēditeras h?el? habbae andf?ndunga tō cr?ftlicum fēatum h?el? fremiae mid hēaldnesse. ?nglisc ?icip?dian ge?una is tō syllan ?eald be?itendum tō ?gh?ilcum h?el? h?fe ??s hēafodlic and symle ?icip?dian l?stend for h?el? fea? mōneas, cūe and ār?ran ?icip?dian ger?dnesse, and h?el? h?fe befohten trēo?an t?s folcs?ipes. Hī magon ?e?ērgian and fordōn bōcscēatas, beluccan otre ēditeras, and ūtādōn tās d?da s?ā ēac. Tās ge?eald sind ?e?iten untō ?orolde, and sind ānum frōcuman ?t bēne oeee under intingan h?el? befiemae hēahtrymlic bēh?eorfnes (seoh betencung bewitenda nīee hēonan). Be?itendas underfōe eac swīeran gesetnessa on sylfwilles bē, and ne sind ?eorcsmitas t?s Wikimedia Foundation (Englisc: ?icim?dia Grundweorc).
On t?m swīee ?restan dagum ?icip?dia, ealle ?yrhtan d?don eallswā swā bewitendas, and on tēorie hīe stille sceoldon. Fram ?restan tīde, hit is ges?d t?t be?itendas ne sceoldon nā giefan hīe sylfe tō speclicum underhlōee t?s folcs?ipes, ac sceoldon bēon d?l t?s folcs?ipes swā swā ōere menn. ?em?nelīce, se hēaldscip and rīcscipe. ?icip?dian m?? bēon fremed fram ?ghwilcum, būtan t?m speclicum cr?ftum te sind bewitendum geset. Tā tōlas te sind bewitendum ?eseald sind cr?ftlīce and ne syllae ānr?dnesse per se (Englisc: be him sylfum), be?itendas sind folc te sind betrymede mid, ?if hīe ne bēoe rihte ?ebrūcode, swīee hearmlicum tōlum.
T?s te bewitendas sind wēnede tō bēon ?efēran folcs?ipes te ?ewiten h?fdon, brūcat tā te fultum sēcae oft wendae tō bewitende for r?d and ?ewit, oeee on geflite. On ?em?nelīcum wīse, bewitendas te swā dōe sind nēodr?de; hī nabbae nān d?lriht on t?m intingan te hī folc mid fultumiae.
Bewitend tōlum
Sēo wiki (Englisc: ?ici) sēftew?r h?ft fēawa tinga te sind ?ebunden. Tā tōlas befēoe weorc swā swā bōcscēata fordēl, bōcscēata ?ewērgung, belīes and unbelīes, and andf?ndnes tō awendan ?ewergode bōcscēatas and tone MediaWiki ?em?nscipe.
Ealle fullice d?las and spr?ce be hira brūcunge sind gereccede ?t Wikipedia:Administrators/Tōlum (ā?riten on Nī?englisc).
- Mearca t?t bewitendas be r?d gesēo swā ylce IP ?ewit be brūcendum swā tā ōere (unbewitende) brūcendas gesēo, and hī ne magon ne gesēon tā bōcscēatas te sind ford?lde mid ofersiht, ne awendan oera brūcenda bot otte sysop hād. ēghwilc tāra behōfae ?cclīcre wealdscipe, sē te bie ānum fēawum brūcendum ?eseald.
Bewitendscipe
Nis nān gesetlic bēnnes tō weorean ?icip?dia bewitend. ān?e hwā m?g bēn c?ean, nē āerēd his ?icip?dian ?efēran. Hweeere, t?t ne m?ne nā t?t nān ?em?re ne s? tō oncnāwanne.
Ongēan t?m is bewitendscipe ?er?d tō folcs?ipes trēowe and cnyttres, nales tō ?ecklistum and ?edīt rīmum; ?ghwilc brūcat h?fe his āgenne w?g tō m?tan his trēowan on candieates gearwednesse tō t?m weorce.
Nūtīdig bewitendas
For nūtīdne list tāra nēahbewitendra, geseoh tās bōcscēatas for t?m listum. Gif tū bewitendlicne fultum tearft and nān ne is nēah, tū meaht āscian ōeee tone sti?eard (brūcend te h?fe bewitendscipe ?ghw?r) otte tone ?oroldbe?itend (brūcend te h?fe bewitendscipe on manegum sm?tlīcum ?icium, tāra in is tis ān).
T?re is on tissum d?ge 1 nēarbī bewitend on sēo ?nglisc ?ikip?dia:
Weard bewitendas
Nis hit swīee r?d
?n oft ?especenword abūtan sē titul and sette ?f bewitendascipe – ?enemned sysops hēr – t?t folgiende, ?es??d bī Jimbo Wales (Englisc: Iaccobus Wēalas) on Solmōnae 2003:
I just wanted to say that becoming a sysop is *not a big deal*.
I think perhaps I'll go through semi-willy-nilly and make a bunch of people who have been around for awhile sysops. I want to dispel the aura of "authority" around the position. It's merely a technical matter that the powers given to sysops are not given out to everyone.
I don't like that there's the apparent feeling here that being granted sysop status is a really special thing.
– Jimbo Wales, wikimedia.org archive entry, gmane archive entry
Nīwer and?iet tisses spr??es, swā hit is on 2025, w?re t?t bewitendas h?bbae hēah weorcgebyrd, and hira rihte brūcung tāra tōla and ?etēode licgae on miclum tearfe. Ac se naman "bewitend" nis micel ting, ne sceal t?s onfēng bēon swā micel ting āwre?ed. Nān ēacen r?dmōdnes bēoe mid t?m bewitendscipe, ne nān frīestbēoe on folc?etēode r?dum. On t?m wīse, hw?ter man is bewitend otte nā, nis hit sylf ānum r?dlic ting.
Becoming an administrator
If you are interested in becoming an admin, you should first read the guide to requests for adminship and the nomination instructions. When you are ready, you may add your nomination to the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship ("RFA") page, according to these instructions. A discussion will then take place among fellow editors about whether you should become an administrator. After seven days, a bureaucrat will determine if there is consensus to give you admin status.
You should become familiar with Wikipedia by editing for a while before requesting or accepting a nomination for administrator status; you need to know what you are doing, and other brūcat will need to recognize you in order to agree on trusting you with admin tools. Keep in mind that each language's Wikipedia has its own policies for administrators, which may differ from this (the English) Wikipedia.
Although multiple brūcat accounts are allowed on Wikipedia in general, only one account of a given person should have administrative tools. The sole exceptions are by agreement of Arbcom or the community.
Warna tū, ic bidde! If you are granted access, you must exercise care in using these new functions, especially the ability to delete pages and the ability to block IP addresses. You can learn how to do these things at the Administrators' how-to guide and the new administrator school. Please also look at the pages linked from the Administrators' reading list before using your administrative abilities.
Administrator tools are also used with judgment; it can take some time for a new administrator to learn when it's best to use the tools, and it can take months to gain a good sense of how long a period to set, when using tools such as blocking and page protection in difficult disputes. New administrators are strongly encouraged to start slowly and build up experience on areas they are used to, and by asking others if unsure.
Administrators and all other brūcat with extra tools are expected to have a strong password, to prevent damage in the case of a compromised account. (See also Wikipedia:Security.)
If you have exercised your right to vanish, and return under a new name, your new name can request administrator access by contacting a bureaucrat privately and producing satisfactory evidence of being the same brūcend, provided you did not originally request desysopping under controversial circumstances. This will not guarantee privacy, however, as new accounts which are granted sysop rights without an RfA tend to attract attention and speculation.
Administrator conduct
Administrators, like all brūcat, are not perfect beings. However in general they are expected to act as role models within the community, and a good general standard of civility, fairness, and general conduct both to brūcat and in content matters, is expected.[1] [2] [3] When acting as administrators, they are also expected to be fair, exercise good judgment, and give explanations and be communicative as necessary.
Administrators who seriously, or repeatedly, act in a problematic manner or have lost the trust or confidence of the community may be sanctioned or have their access removed. In the past, this has happened or been suggested for:
- Misuse of tools (deletion, protection, blocking in clearly improper circumstances)
- Breach of basic policies (attacks, biting/civility, edit warring, privacy, etc)
- Repeated/consistent poor judgment
- Fighting with the tools (known as "wheel warring"). Summary: With very few exceptions, as soon as an action using tools is reversed by another administrator, it should not be reinstated by the original brūcend or any admin, no matter how good the intention may be, without consensus. But see also exceptions below.
- Failure to communicate[4] - this can be either to brūcat(eg lack of suitable warnings or explanations of actions), or to concerns of the community (especially when explanations or other serious comments are sought).
- 'Bad faith' adminship (sock puppetry, good hand/bad hand, gross breach of trust[5], etc)
- Conduct elsewhere incompatible with adminship (off site attacking, etc)
Places where administrators in particular can assist
Administrator rights can be particularly helpful for working in certain areas of Wikipedia.
- Incidents that may require admin intervention
- Three-revert rule violations
- Intervention against vandalism
- Copyright problems (advice for admins)
- Candidates for speedy deletion
- Administrative backlog
- Enforcing Arbitration Committee decisions
- Administrators will also find their tools useful for Recent changes patrol.
See also Wikipedia:Admins willing to make difficult blocks, where admins willing to handle more difficult blocks and other situations can make themselves known.
Grievances by brūcat ("Administrator abuse")
If a user thinks an administrator has acted improperly against them or another editor, they should express their concerns directly to the administrator responsible and try to come to a resolution in an orderly and civil manner. However, if the matter is not resolved between the two parties, brūcat can take further action (see Wikipedia:Dispute Resolution). For more possibilities, see Requests for comment/User conduct: Use of administrator privileges and Administrator's noticeboard: Incidents
Misuse of tools
Wikip?dia:Administrators/Misuse of tools section
Reinstating a reverted action ("Wheel warring")
Administrators are strictly forbidden from fighting over the use of administrative tools by using those tools, whether for desirable reasons or not.
With very few exceptions, when an action performed using tools has been rejected to the point that another administrator has reversed it (or similar related actions were reversed), then there is almost never a valid reason for the original or any other administrator to reinstate the same or similar action (or end result) again, without clear discussion leading to a consensus decison. Administrators who do so risk desysopping for abuse of their access.
As a corollary, reversal of an administrative action should also not be undertaken lightly, or without good cause.
Exceptional circumstances
With very few exceptions, once tool use has been reverted, tools should not be used by the original (or any other) administrator in that matter (even for a desirable reason). There are a few, specific, exceptions where re-use of tools may be reasonable:
- WP:BLP - material deleted because it contravenes BLP may be re-deleted if reinstated, if it continues to be non-BLP-compliant.
- Privacy - personal information deleted under the Foundations privacy policy may be re-deleted if reinstated.
- Emergency - in certain situations there may arise an emergency that cannot be adjourned for discussion. An administrator should not claim emergency unless there is a reasonable belief of a present and very serious emergency (ie, reasonable possibility of actual, imminent, serious harm to the project or a user if not acted upon with admin tools), and should immediately seek to describe and address the matter, but in such a case the action should not usually be reverted (and may be reinstated) until appropriate discussion has taken place.
- Page protection in edit warring - reasonable actions undertaken by uninvolved administrators to quell a visible and heated edit war by protecting a contended page should be respected by all brūcat, and protection may be reinstated if needed, until it is clear the edit war will not resume or consensus agrees it is appropriate to unprotect.
Note these are "one way" exceptions; for example, an exception for re-deletion does not imply that an exception exists for re-reversal, unless consensus seeking has taken place.
Removal of adminship
Administrators can be removed if they misuse their powers. Currently, administrators may be removed either at the request of Jimbo Wales or by a ruling of the Arbitration Committee. At their discretion, lesser penalties may also be assessed against problematic administrators, including the restriction of their use of certain powers or placement on administrative probation. The technical ability to remove administrator status rests with stewards.
There have been alternative procedures suggested for the removal of sysop status, but none of them have achieved consensus. Some administrators will voluntarily stand for reconfirmation under certain circumstances; see Category:Wikipedia administrators open to recall.
- (Note - removal of rights does not currently show up in the usual user logs. Use {{Userrights|username}} for full links to user rights information and full logs, including the stewards' global logs on meta as well, or Syndrig:Listusers to verify a brūcates current rights.)
Security
- Heafodgewrit: Wikipedia:Security
It is extremely important that administrators have strong passwords and follow personal security practices. Because they have the potential to cause site-wide damage with a single edit, a compromised sysop account will be blocked and its privileges removed on grounds of site security. In certain circumstances, the revocation of privileges may be permanent. Discretion on resysopping temporarily desysopped administrators is left to bureaucrats, who will consider whether the rightful owner has been correctly identified, and their view on the incident and the management and security (including likely future security) of the account.
See also
- Administrators' how-to guide
- Administrators' reading list
- Advice for new administrators
- An essay on what adminship is not
- Automatically generated list of administrators
- Chart of the growth in number of administrators (through early 2007)
- Former administrators
- List of administrators with promotion dates
- Meta:Administrators of various Wikipedias - administrators in all Wikipedias.
- New admin school